A correction

Apparently, I got a detail of the Smiths’ viewing on their inadvertently subscribed TV package slightly wrong.

The films watched, apart from Mr Jacqui Smith’s double feature wankathon viewing, were ‘Surf’s Up’ and ‘Oceans 13’.

However…

…’Oceans 13′ was watched TWICE!

WHY?

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. What’s weird is that the row is over the porn, when the whole point is that expenses were claimed for stuff that has nothing to do with parliamentary duties.

    Therefore, the porn is only one part of the problem. They shouldn’t have claimed for Oceans 13 or Surfs Up.

    The reason why the porn is highlighted is because it’s a juicier story, and the Mail get to publish lurid photos in order to demonstrate what porn might mean, which is very difficult for chaps like the proverbial ‘Dave from Basingstoke’ who feel a strong compuction to jack off over such pics while Rita is looking the other way, watering the Dandelions.

  2. Oh, I totally agree.
    It’s just that the wanking aspect is such a – ahem – fertile one.
    It’s easier to rip the piss out of those involved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: